The Lever Nobody Is Using
While the legislature fights over the tax bill in special session, a quieter and more durable protection sits unused in Alaska land law. Construction cannot begin on state land until the state says so. The state hasn't said so yet. And Glenfarne just admitted it won't know what this project costs until mid-2027.
Everyone is watching the special session. The governor vetoed the pension bill. Lawmakers are being called back to Juneau. The pressure is intense and the timeline is brutal. In all of that noise, a critical legal fact about this project has gone completely unnoticed in the public debate.
Before one shovel of dirt moves on Alaska state land, Glenfarne needs the state's permission. Not the legislature's permission on a tax bill. The DNR commissioner's permission to convert conditional right-of-way leases into full construction leases. That conversion has not happened. It requires a public interest finding. And Glenfarne just acknowledged it won't have verified project costs until mid-2027.
Those two facts together create a legal problem that no amount of political pressure resolves. A public interest finding made before verified costs exist is a finding made on incomplete information. It is administratively and legally vulnerable on its face. And nobody in the public debate has said so yet.
What the Law Actually Requires
The Alaska LNG pipeline crosses 807 miles of terrain. Approximately 230 miles cross federal land — mostly along the existing Trans-Alaska Pipeline corridor. The remainder crosses state and private land. For state land, right-of-way leases are required under AS 38.35.
In April 2021, the state issued two conditional right-of-way leases for the pipeline and associated facilities on state-owned land. The word "conditional" is doing critical legal work here.
Conditional right-of-way leases were issued April 13, 2021 for the pipelines under AS 38.35.100(b). These leases require conversion under AS 38.35.100(a) before construction may begin. These leases are only applicable on state-owned lands.
Before a conditional ROW lease converts to a full construction lease, the commissioner must consider the public interest and issue written findings substantiating the decision to allow the conversion. The commissioner must also approve any transfer of control of the lessee — defined as transfer of 30% or more of ownership interest.
The conversion has not happened. Construction cannot legally begin on state land without it. The commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources must make a written public interest finding before Glenfarne can break ground on any state-owned portion of the 807-mile route.
The Cost Problem That Makes the Finding Impossible
Here is what Glenfarne has told the world about its own project costs, in sequence:
Mid-2027. That is when Glenfarne says verified project costs will be available. Not late 2025 as originally promised. Not early 2026. Mid-2027 — a full eighteen months after Glenfarne took majority control of the project and nearly two years after Worley was hired to produce a final cost estimate for FID.
Why the ROW Conversion Cannot Proceed
The DNR commissioner's public interest finding is not a rubber stamp. It is a substantive administrative determination that construction proceeding on state land serves the public interest of Alaskans. That finding must be made in writing and is subject to legal challenge.
What would a defensible public interest finding require? At minimum:
Every single element of a defensible public interest finding depends on verified project costs. Glenfarne says those costs won't be verified until mid-2027. A commissioner who signs a public interest finding before mid-2027 is signing a finding that cannot be substantiated by the information that exists at the time of signing.
The Commitment Sequence Glenfarne Is Demanding
Step back and look at what Glenfarne is asking Alaska to commit to — and when — against the timeline of when costs will actually be known.
The sequence is not accidental. Each commitment is extracted before the information that would allow Alaska to evaluate it arrives. By the time costs are verified in mid-2027, the tax structure will be locked in, the ROW leases will have converted, and construction will have begun. Alaska will have no leverage left at the only moment when it will finally know what it agreed to.
The Transfer That Also Requires Commissioner Approval
There is one more provision of AS 38.35.100 that deserves attention. The statute requires the commissioner to approve any transfer of 30% or more of ownership interest in the conditional ROW lessee.
When AGDC transferred 75% of 8 Star Alaska to Glenfarne in March 2025, that was a transfer of 75% of the entity holding the conditional ROW leases — well above the 30% threshold. The public record does not show a commissioner's written public interest finding approving that transfer. If that approval was not obtained, the transfer of the conditional leases to an entity majority-controlled by Glenfarne may not have been properly authorized under Alaska land law.
That is a question the legislature — or any interested Alaskan — has standing to ask the DNR commissioner to answer publicly.
The Lever
The legislature has spent this entire session fighting over the tax bill. That fight is real and important. But it is not the only fight available — and it may not be the most durable one.
The conditional ROW lease conversion is a separate, independent decision point that does not require a legislative majority. It requires one thing: a DNR commissioner willing to apply the public interest standard the statute requires, rather than treating the conversion as a formality to be completed on Glenfarne's schedule.
The commissioner cannot make a defensible written public interest finding before verified costs exist. Glenfarne has acknowledged those costs won't exist until mid-2027. Therefore the ROW conversion cannot defensibly proceed until mid-2027 at the earliest.
That is not obstruction. That is Alaska land law doing exactly what it was written to do — ensuring that before Alaska's public land is committed to a private developer's construction project, a substantive determination has been made that the commitment serves the public interest.
The Question for the Commissioner
Governor Dunleavy is calling the legislature back into special session to pass tax legislation this week. The same governor's DNR commissioner controls whether the conditional ROW leases on state land ever convert to construction leases.
The question is simple: On what verified information would the commissioner base a written finding that construction proceeding on state land serves the public interest of Alaskans — when Glenfarne has acknowledged that the verified cost of what is being built will not be known until mid-2027?
If the commissioner cannot answer that question, the conversion cannot proceed. And if the conversion cannot proceed, construction cannot begin on state land — regardless of what happens in special session.
The lever exists. It is grounded in statute. It has never been used. It should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment