Showing posts with label barack obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label barack obama. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 07, 2014

The Alaska Supreme Court Bungles the Political Doctrine Question

I was waiting for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the California Secretary of State's decision to remove a presidential candidate from the ballot.

I notified the Court on the 9th circuit case to ensure that they had the necessary information to come up with a logical decision. They blew it big time.

Even though they issued a MOJ in my case against President Obama, the MOJ according to the Alaska Supreme Court Appellate rules can be cited to so that leaves the court in a legal predicament if another scenario comes up.

The 9th circuit case decision can be read here.

Bottom line, as the 9th circuit court points out, the state has the authority to make a decision on the eligibility of a candidate and can keep them off the ballot.

The MOJ in my case can be read here.

It is evident the Alaska Supreme Court bungled the political doctrine question. 





Sunday, February 02, 2014

It's A Public Right to Know: Lamb v Obama

Here is the link to the oral argument that was before the Alaska Supreme Court.

While the Obama supporters continue to call this a birther case, the case was never about the president being born in Kenya.

In 2008, I wrote about his adoption.

Unfortunately, litigants like Orly Taitz have muddied up the legal landscape with poorly argued cases that rendered poorly thought out legal decisions that are used as case decisions to bolster more poorly crafted decisions.

It has now become a nightmare to litigate in a court, an argument that can break through the idiocy that has been laid by Taitz and enshrined in court decisions.

In the oral argument you will hear how the DOJ under Eric Holder misrepresented the fact that Barack Obama's own campaign admitted he held a dual citizenship (side bar: Ted Cruz is in the Left's sights) in court documents.

So while Justice Winfree focused his questioning on if I could sue a judge or Governor Parnell and Joe Miller's employment records, the fact of the matter is: the Alaska court can order the release of the college and birth records of the president.

That is a legal fact.

How the Alaska Supreme Court rules on your right to know what the facts are? That question will soon be answered.






 


Thursday, January 16, 2014

Oral Argument Alaska Supreme Court Lamb v Obama

Yesterday the Alaska Supreme Court held the oral argument in my case against President Obama.

First some janitorial work (clean up the BS on the internet) must be attended to - according to Great Grey an Alaskan icon in legalese who has a dual identity but hangs his head in an elevator and doesn't like to look you in the eye but put his two cents in.

Here is what took place without the GreatGrey the BS.

The questions and answers were between Justice Winfree and myself and one exchange dealt with his statement that the Alaska Dispatch Joe Miller case revolved around local documents.

This statement was borne out of my statement that the Alaska Dispatch stated in brief the public/voter has a right to know what the facts are that surround a public official.

Even the Court has supported that - so his statement was turned to an issue that required and answer and that was if it was a case of paternity - the documents (like a birth certificate) from another state could be requested.

After the answer, he moved to ask if I could sue Judges - I looked at the Justices and stated yes - reason: after all they were elected by the voter - he then moved to ask if I could sue Governor Parnell - I answered yes - reason: again he is elected by the voter. 


He did ask if I was representing the public - I indicated that I had citizen/taxpayer standing and that I am affected by Obamacare, etc, etc,  and that the public had an interest in this case.

One important point 


It was pointed out that an affidavit states the President went to college as a foreign student. And that the Indonesian constitution barred the President from holding a dual citizenship. Implication is fraud had been committed by the President if he did enroll himself in college as a foreign student.

This case was argued in a manner that it is a Catch 22. I would be surprised if they issue a published ruling.

Interestingly, there was one suit in the audience and he was not part of the crazy fringe that hang out at Fogbow. Who was he? No answer.

As for my conversation with GreatGrey - I can understand why he hides behind an anonymous when he likes to attack people. His lack of strength to look you in the eye and look at the ground was telling.

Too bad.

Friday, October 11, 2013

Perjury or Fraud: Is President Barack Obama a Birther and Islamophobe?



Since October 7th has come and gone and the President has expectedly not replied to my brief before the Alaska Supreme Court by October7th, the question in the above title is appropriate.

While the terminology “birther” has been placed on a group of people who believe President Obama was born in Kenya, in fair play, the question has to be asked: is the President a “birther” or just a fraud?

Before the “birther” term came to be in the 2008 presidential election, evidently in 1991, someone who published a booklet listed the President as being born in Kenya.

Now there have been public statements made to the effect that the printed statement was made in error.

Not exactly a compelling case of truth when you consider the State Department lied in court pleadings that the President never held a Kenyan citizenship when he did.

In fact, the President’s campaign posted on its Fight the Smears website that he indeed held a dual citizenship and one being a Kenyan citizenship. This being stated on the campaign site in 2008.


So why did the State Department in answering a complaint state on October 5th, 2009 “to the  extent this paragraph alleges that President Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, or is or ever was a citizen of Kenya or British subject, those allegations are denied.”

Let the excuses fly – but the State Department misled the court after information was publicly posted by the Obama campaign to the contrary.

In another case, lawyers for the government argued in legal proceedings that the President was never a practicing Muslim – to the contrary that he was when he was in Indonesia.

Again the court was misled. And what is with the denial of being a practicing Muslim. Is this a case of a lawyer being an Islamophobe? Or just playing politics in pleadings by misleading the court.

What remains from the actions taken by the State Department and DOJ to mislead the court is: did the President enroll himself in college as a foreign student -  choosing his foreign citizenship over his American citizenship.

That can be answered by the Alaska Supreme Court with instructing the Superior Court in my case to order the release and inspection of the documents requested.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Hear Ye Hear Ye: Senator Ted Cruz is a Modern Day Robin Hood



It seems Barack Obama our King, has dispatched his sheriff, Harry Reid to rape and pillage the pocket books and healthcare benefits of the citizenry, while the modern day Robin Hood Ted Cruz is being charged with being an anarchist.

I must admit, I slept only two hours because I watched a modern day Robin Hood on C-Span talk for almost 22 hours. And while citizens like Karl Rove slept and subjects of the U.S. Senate feared being blamed for shutting down Barack Obama’s kingdom, Ted Cruz and his Merry Men tried to stop Barack Obama’s sheriff from raping and pillaging the pocket books and healthcare benefits of the citizenry.

But to no avail, Robin Hood and his Merry Men were outnumbered by men who feared being blamed for shutting down Barack Obama’s kingdom.

So now we will see the subjects of the House delay the rape and pillaging by one year as a way to gain favor with the citizens of Barack Obama’s kingdom, in hope that sheriff  Reid’s posse is weakened.

That will remain to be seen, since a delay is precisely what a few number of sheriff Reid’s posse want. In the end, who will get the blame if Reid’s posse is not weakened in numbers?

It won’t be the modern day Robin Hood and his Merry Men, it will be those subjects who feared being blamed more than acting against the rape and pillaging of the citizenry of Barack Obama’s kingdom.

Friday, August 23, 2013

The Dueling Citizenship of President Barack Obama and Senator Ted Cruz

I wondered when the press would get around to scrutinizing Senator Ted Cruz’s eligibility to run for the highest political office in the land. 

The Dallas Morning Star recently ran a story entitled: "Dual citizenship may pose problem if Ted Cruz seeks presidency."

We all knew it was just a matter of time, despite the love affair with one President Obama and the media's feigned outrage at those who would have the gall to question his eligibility.

Aaron Blake of The Washington Post also authored an article about how Senator Cruz is going to renounce his Canadian citizenship.

Others piled on as well: Ruth Tam from The Washington Post maintained that Senator Cruz had to renounce his Canadian citizenship, and in USA Today,  Steffen Schmidt opined that Senator Ted Cruz’s citizenship could linger as an issue well into the next presidential cycle, stating "…I am certain that the issue of dual citizenship, which was never an issue with Obama, will percolate through the GOP herd of potential presidential contenders.”

While the issue of dual citizenship and the eligibility of Senator Cruz has apparently been laid to rest, Steffen Schmidt could not be more wrong about President Obama's issues. The media protest about the lack of similarity with respect to the nature of the controversies surrounding President Obama and Senator Cruz may be a little premature.

In a case brought against the U.S. Department of State, the Department of Justice denied in court documents that President Obama was ever a citizen of Kenya, or a British subject.

However, according to Factcheck.org, President Obama was a citizen of Kenya because his father was a citizen of Kenya. He would have therefore held a dual citizenship until the age of 23.

As an adult, if he did not renounce his Kenyan citizenship, he would maintain a dual status.

However, the fact that there is no record of Obama having renounced his Kenyan citizenship leaves us with a more ominous specter. Did he renounce his US citizenship as a college student in order to receive aid as a foreign student?

If so, it would explain why there is a booklet published in 1991 that claims Obama was born in Kenya. It would also explain further allegations that the president attended college as a foreign student, and his reticence to release his transcripts.

While the press is focused on Senator Ted Cruz’s dual citizenship, I have filed a case in the Alaska Supreme Court asking that the college records of President Obama be made public. After all, if the public has "a right to know" about a candidate for US Senate, doesn't it stand to reason that they also have "a right to know" about the man they call president who also appeared on the ballot in Alaska.

Only when all the facts come out will the controversy surrounding this president be quelled. Mr. President, just release your records so we can move on already!

Friday, November 30, 2012

Silence of the Lamb: A Twitter Chit-Chat With @Whitehouse on @WHlive

Elections are a funny thing - Politicians are known to come up with zingers during the election. But when one gets elected, well that is when the interesting zingers manifest themselves.

During the 2012 presidential you had Romney talking about the 47% who wouldn't vote for him, then you had Obama talking about the 1-2% and the rich.

I could have sworn that "Obama iPhones" where the talk of the town but alas wee Hobbits - you are about to become a sacrificial lamb along with the 2%.

I had a little twitter Chit-Chat with a White House official on The White House twitter account @WHlive.

I had sent a tweet asking who would pay 4 the debt crisis - nothing - then I tweeted this:



Hence the title "Silence of the Lamb." The silence didn't last long.



So we get to the real truth after the election - POTUS believes we need shared sacrifice, i.e. tough cuts in programs many families rely on + real revenue from top 2%

Tough cuts in programs many famlies rely on - like maybe $200,000.00 from the Stone Soup Group; money that helped military families with disabled children.

Did you hear tough cuts in programs many famlies rely on from President Obama when he was campaigning?  All you will hear is silence in answer.

I showed the above tweet to a Black friend of mine who supported Obama. The look on his face said it all.

I felt sorry for him.


Saturday, October 06, 2012

Our Part-tIme President Builds a Part-time Economy

The news has come in on the Jobs report - 7.8% a drop from 8.1% and President Obama is touting the figures as a positive.

You can tell our part-time president doesn't understand how people need full-time work.

When you break it down, the drop in unemployment is because of the increase in part-time employment.

Due to the increase in part-time employment, the so-called underemployment rate — which includes part-timers who’d prefer a full-time position and people who want work but have given up looking — held at 14.7 percent.

Because part-time workers are typically the first to be fired when economic conditions worsen, the gain in these types of jobs takes some of the shine off the drop in joblessness, said Neil Dutta, head of U.S. economics at Renaissance Macro Research in New York.

“It’s an employment recovery built on thin ice,” said Dutta. “If there was an immediate downturn or even a weakness heading into the end of the year, who’s going to be the first one to go?”

A question: Is Obamacare fueling businesses to hire part-time workers? Yes.

For businesses to avoid the high cost of Obamacare and avoid a penalty, businesses will have to hire part-time employees.

The major provisions of the so-called Obamacare scheduled to take effect in 2014 affect employers with large numbers of part-time and low-paid workforces. For example, beginning in 2014 employers with 50 or more full-time workers -- defined as those working at least 30 hours a week -- will be required to extend coverage to all full-time employees or face possible penalties of $2,000 per employee.
 
Many retail and restaurant employers hover around the 50-worker threshold and feel that it would make economic sense to stay small -- cut hours or eliminate worker -- to avoid triggering the requirements of the law.
 
Mercer found that about 46 percent of restaurant and retail companies said they would have to change in some way once the law comes into effect, compared with 16 percent of financial-services companies.
 
And for those part-timers who don't have health insurance - well, you get taxed via Obamacare -built by Obama and Democrats.
 
 

Sunday, September 09, 2012

The Demand Letter To Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney

The following Demand letter will be sent to the campaign headquarters to Barack Obama and Mitt Romney:


To the 2012 presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney,
On behalf of myself, Thomas Lamb as a resident of the State of Alaska, it is respectfully requested that the following documents be released by both candidates to the public so the voting public and I can make a fully informed decision with regard to voting for either candidate.
A complete set of medical records/all education records to include admission records/Internal Revenue Service records dating back 10 years/personnel records at Bain Capital and ACORN are being requested.
The topic of education records and medical records of presidential candidate Barack Obama have been of concern with high profile figures like Donald Trump and a voting bloc. Likewise, allegations that Mitt Romney hasn’t paid taxes in 10 years have been made by high profile figures like Senator Harry Reid and are a concern of a voting bloc.
Since the issue on the public view of federal candidates’ records have been successfully litigated and to resolve a possible federal question of controversy over the parity of a records request, it would be prudent for both candidates to release the requested records so a federal controversy in parity surrounding a records request can be resolved.
If either candidate feels it is not prudent to release the requested records, then civil legal action following cases (see FA-10-02886 CI) in Alaska’s Superior Court and in other states, like the taxpayer/citizen standing civil legal proceedings against Senate candidates Blair Hull and Jack Ryan may be considered on an expedited consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas Lamb

 
Update: A complaint in Alaska Superior Court will be filed this week. The complaint will cite federal statute governing the Full Faith and Credit Clause on public records.

Update II: The complaint has been filed today in Alaska Superior Court. The case No. is 3AN-12-9961-CI COMPLAINT FOR ACCESS TO RECORDS OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES MITT ROMNEY AND BARACK OBAMA
 

Sunday, August 16, 2009

There is no joy in Mudflats...

Dan Riehl reports that upon hearing the news that Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) said the Senate will never pass a government-funded public health insurance option, and it was futile to continue to "chase that rabbit" -- President Obama...
"...was rumored to have been spotted roaming the White House in a stupor late last night searching for his faux-Greecian, paper mache columns cursing, my kingdom for a Facebook account! Woe is me, oh woe...."  
Riehl says "one fast ball over the plate from Sarah Palin" and the mighty Sox Fan has fanned. Dan goes on to paraphrase Shakespeare, but we were inspired to have our way with some lines from Thayer:
Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright;
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light,
And somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout;
But there is no joy at Mudflats — mighty Barack has struck out.
- JP